Cases 1 - 10 of 100
(PC) Trevino v. State of California, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2026cv02339
Plaintiff:
Robert Trevino
Defendant:
State of California, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Booker, A. Cisneros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - ALL FILINGS SHOULD BE DOCKETED IN 5:26-CT-3194-FL Escobar v. Federal Correctional Institution- Butner Medium II et al
as 5:2026cv00447
Plaintiff:
Amber Escobar
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Institution - Butner Medium II, United States Bureau of Prisons, Colette S. Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Escobar v. Federal Correctional Institution- Butner Medium II et al
as 5:2026ct03194
Plaintiff:
Amber Escobar
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Institution - Butner Medium II, United States Bureau of Prisons, Colette S. Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Muhammed Tillisy v. D. Leu
as 26-6347
Petitioner:
MUHAMMED Z. TILLISY
Respondent:
D. LEU, Warden FCI- 2
MATTHEWS v. LEU
as 1:2025cv04584
Petitioner:
KONATA MATTHEWS
Respondent:
D. LEU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Leu
as 5:2025hc02256
Petitioner:
Dedrick M. Jones
Respondent:
Warden Leu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MATTHEWS v. LEU
as 1:2025cv04593
Petitioner:
KONATA MATTHEWS
Respondent:
D. LEU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Maulden v. Leu
as 5:2025hc02244
Petitioner:
Dennis Edward Maulden
Respondent:
Warden Leu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tillisy v. Leu
as 5:2025hc02234
Petitioner:
Muhammed Z. Tillisy
Respondent:
D. Leu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
