Cases 1 - 10 of 154
Moraga v. Minev, et al.
as 24-160
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY D. MORAGA
Defendant / Appellee:
MINEV, J. ISAACSON and D. RICHARD
RICHARDS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv15349
Plaintiff:
CEMEIA D RICHARDS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RICHARDS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv02443
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH D RICHARDS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Richard
as 4:2023cv03865
Petitioner:
Dale D. Richard
Respondent:
Contra Costa County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lockridge v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
Chaney Sinclair Lockridge
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, Milwaukee County, John T Chisholm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Lockridge v. Chisholm et al
as 2:2023cv00403
Plaintiff:
Chaney Sinclair Lockridge
Defendant:
John T Chisholm, Jonathan D Richards and Susan M Roth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richard, Jr. v. Fender
as 3:2023cv00599
Petitioner:
Gregory D. Richard, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Douglas Fender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butler v. Richards et al
as 1:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Anthony Anton Butler
Defendant:
D. Richards, A. Shepard, John Does 1 and 2 and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv24595
Plaintiff:
CHARLES D RICHARDS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Richards III et al v. HarttoHart, LLC
as 3:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Fletcher D Richards III and Judith Richards
Defendant:
HarttoHart, LLC
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
