Cases 11 - 20 of 59
Oliver v. Montgomery County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00068
Plaintiff:
David O. Oliver
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail, D. T. Marshall and Wanda Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Montgomery County Jail et al
as 2:2012cv04060
Plaintiff:
David Oliver
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail, D T Marshall and Wanda Robinson
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Anderson, et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00190
Plaintiff:
Albert King
Defendant:
Officer Anderson , D. T. Marshall , Wanda J. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGuire v. City of Montgomery, et al
as 2:2011cv01027
Plaintiff:
Michael A. McGuire
Defendant:
Kevin J. Murphy , D. T. Marshall , Hugh B. McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Marshall, et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2011cv01001
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Johnson
Defendant:
D. T. Marshall , Col. Roberson , Maj. Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Couch v. Marshall et al(MAG+)
as 2:2011cv00950
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Monique Couch
Defendant:
D. T. Marshall and Dante' Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanderson v. Alabama State Bar Disciplinary Commission et al
as 2:2010cv00878
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Sanderson
Defendant:
Alabama State Bar Disciplinary Commission, Montgomery County Jail, Robert E. Luske, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Couch v. Marshall et al
as 2:2010cv00661
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Monique Couch
Defendant:
D. T. Marshall and Dante' Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeney v. Marshall et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00373
Plaintiff:
Richard Barker Freeney
Defendant:
D. T. Marshall, C.O. Lyold, C.O. Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
