Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Jones v. Puffenbarger et al
as 1:2015cv03137
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones
Defendant:
Janet Puffenbarger, Balanski, D. W. Rounds, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Dunston, Jr. v. E.C. Albert
as 15-7160
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD DUNSTON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
E. C. ALBERT, Raleigh Police Department, S. A. KOPESAK, Raleigh Police Department, D. W. MEAD, Raleigh Police Department and others
Net 3 Technology Inc v. D&W Fine Pack LLC et al
as 6:2014cv04511
Plaintiff:
Net 3 Technology Inc
Defendant:
D&W Fine Pack LLC , D&W Fine Pack Holdings LLC and CM Packaging Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Dougherty v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 14-7203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT W. DOUGHERTY
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF, Fairfax County, Virginia, SHERIFF STAN BARRY, Fairfax County Adult Detention Center, Fairfax VA and others
McFadden v. McCall et al
as 4:2013cv03087
Plaintiff:
Joe Tajharey McFadden
Defendant:
D Michael McCall, Lt Bradley, Sgt Goodman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Rounds et al
as 1:2013cv02480
Plaintiff:
Eddie Murphy
Defendant:
D. W. Rounds, Officer Whetstone, L. Conrad Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Burney, Jr. v. D. Bray
as 13-1774
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT EARL BURNEY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
D. W. BRAY
Carr v. Ballard
as 2:2012cv00909
Petitioner:
James D. W. Carr
Respondent:
David Ballard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Barksdale et al
as 7:2011cv00598
Defendant:
Earl W. Barksdale and D. W. Call
Plaintiff:
Vincent Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Barksdale et al
as 7:2011cv00505
Defendant:
Earl W. Barksdale and D. W. Call
Plaintiff:
Vincent Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
