Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Clark v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv02287
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Leslie Dane Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv41101
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANE CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv40431
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANE CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv04101
Defendant:
AERO HOLDING LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AERO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANE CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARIBUABO et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv00893
Plaintiff:
IRA HORNE, MICHAEL COSGROVE, DUSTIN PRICE and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aribuabo et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv00475
Plaintiff:
Ira Horne, Michael Cosgrove, Dustin Price and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo Technologies LLC and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Dane Clark
as 15-7190
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANE CLARK, a/k/a Darrell Howell, a/k/a Paul Grier, a/k/a Oral Merchant
Geer v. Clark et al
as 9:2014cv00813
Plaintiff:
Pakenauth Geer
Defendant:
Dane Clark, B. Inglee, T. Sheehan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2013cv03024
Petitioner:
Dane Clark Torres
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Torres v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2013cv03023
Petitioner:
Dane Clark Torres
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
