Cases 1 - 10 of 118
Kasyjanski v. Allyene et al
as 1:2024cv02278
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Kasyjanski
Defendant:
Jennifer Allyene, Kelly Lotnard, Nicole Chimenti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv04942
Plaintiff:
DANIEL EUGENE MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv02104
Plaintiff:
DANIEL E MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kasyjanski v. Fairfield County Solicitors Office et al
as 0:2023cv01756
Plaintiff:
Keith Kasyjanski and Keith Edward Kasyjanski
Defendant:
Fairfield County Solicitors Office, Fairfield Law Enforcement, Fairfield County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Baumgartner et al v. Woodruff Tobacco & Vapor LLC et al
as 6:2022cv01390
Plaintiff:
Matthew Baumgartner and Daniel Keaton Miller
Defendant:
Woodruff Tobacco & Vapor LLC and Himyar S Rashani
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Harton v. Board et al
as 2:2021cv00678
Plaintiff:
Paul M. Harton
Defendant:
Matthew E. Board, Daniel W. Miller, Todd J. Lambiotte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Daniel Miller
as 21-5598
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL FRANK MILLER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05294
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Daniel Miller
as 21-10117
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL AARON MILLER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lusk v. Lamin et al
as 2:2020cv06064
Defendant:
Alsata Salimatu Lamin, Brian Kenneth Pulliam, Lynn Marie Gutridge and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Wills Lusk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
