Cases 1 - 10 of 15
HURLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv87060
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HURLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HURLEY v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv01359
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hurley
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA LP and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hamilton v. Stephenson et al
as 2:2018cv00159
Defendant:
Nicholas Paddon, Aaron Branstutter, Daniel Hurley and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gressett v. Best et al
as 4:2017cv02709
Plaintiff:
James Everett Gressett
Defendant:
Daniel Hurley Best and Latoya D. Barnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brian Hurley, et al v. Molly Anderson, et al
as 17-12985
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN HURLEY, JASON HURLEY, DANIELLE HURLEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MOLLY K. ANDERSON, GREGORY BABCOCK, JOHN LESTER BANGS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-35498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hurley et al V. Anderson et al
as 9:2016cv80102
Plaintiff:
Brian Hurley , Jason Hurley , Danielle Hurley and others
Defendant:
Molly K Anderson , Gregory Babcock , John Lester Bangs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NSTAR Electric Company v. NLRB
as 14-1724
Petitioner:
NSTAR ELECTRIC & GAS CORPORATION
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Interested Party:
DANIEL HURLEY
NLRB v. NSTAR Electric & Gas Company
as 14-1622
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
NSTAR ELECTRIC & GAS NSTAR ELECTRIC & GAS CORPORATION
Interested Party:
DANIEL HURLEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
