Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Nair v. Leal, et al.
as 26-1437
Plaintiff:
JAYAKRISHNAN NAIR
Defendant:
DANIEL LEAL, DAVID F. BROWN and COUNTY OF CLARK
Dymond Thomas v. Department of Homeland Security
as 25-2471
Plaintiff:
DYMOND THOMAS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, HOMELAND SECURITY INVESTIGATIONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Nair v. Leal et al
as 2:2025cv01257
Defendant:
Daniel Leal, David F. Brown and Clark County
Plaintiff:
Jayakrishnan Nair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 0.118 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS et al
as 7:2025cv00091
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
0.118 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, America Arredondo, Mariana Trevino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
Nair v. Titan Towing et al
as 2:2024cv02255
Defendant:
Daniel Leal, County of Clark, State of Nevada and others
Plaintiff:
Jayakrishnan Nair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Thomas v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2024cv00916
Defendant:
Dena J. King, Seth Johnson, Benjamin Bain-Creed and others
Plaintiff:
Dymond Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leal v. Carter
as 1:2022cv01318
Petitioner:
Daniel Leal
Defendant:
Elizabeth Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
LEAL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv63055
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEAL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miguel Leal v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 17-16897
Petitioner - Appellant:
MIGUEL DANIEL LEAL
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Leal #241025 v. Ryan et al
as 4:2014cv02271
Petitioner:
Miguel Daniel Leal
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
