Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
McNamara v. Allen et al
as 3:2021mc00010
Defendant:
Michael Givilancz, Peter Bauer, Kimberly Leiter and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas W. McNamara
MOSS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv94427
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL MOSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOSS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv81160
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL MOSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOSS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv90966
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
HUGH DANIEL MOSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOSS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv43926
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL MOSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Daniel Moss
as 18-10215
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL MOSS
Federal Trade Commission v. Lombardo, Daniels & Moss, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00503
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Lombardo, Daniels & Moss, LLC , Dion Barron, Charles R. Montgomery, III and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053
Thomas W. McNamara v. Lee Samuel Allen et al
as 2:2017cv02858
Defendant:
Lee Samuel Allen, Michael Givilancz, Peter Bauer and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas W. McNamara and Thomas W. McNamara as the Court-Appointed Receiver for PLCMGMT LLC doing business as Prometheus Law
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Moss v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv05016
Plaintiff:
Crystal Danielle Moss
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
