Cases 1 - 8 of 8
REDDING et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2025cv01027
Plaintiff:
MELANIE REDDING and DANIEL REDDING
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, EAST PHILLY CAFE, INC. doing business as BRIDGET FOY'S, ABC STAFF OR CORPORATIONS 1-2 and others
Cross-Complainant:
EAST PHILLY CAFE, INC.
Cross-Defendant:
ABC INDIVIDUALS 1-2, ABC STAFF OR CORPORATIONS 1-2 and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
REDDING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv61651
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL REDDING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Redding v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv04956
Plaintiff:
Daniel Redding
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fox v. Kinlisky et al
as 5:2018cv00078
Plaintiff:
Duane L. Fox
Defendant:
FNU Kinlisky, Christopher P. Mury, FNU Going and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2017cv02142
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Smith, Rexford Martin, Ronald Matheny and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company, Osborn & Barr Communications, Inc. and Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Smith et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 4:2017cv01117
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Smith , Rexford Martin , Ronald Matheny and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company , Osborn & Barr Communications, Inc. and Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cierra Word et al v. Experian Holdings, Inc. et al
as 8:2015cv02167
Plaintiff:
Amjed Ababseh, Kathleen Alcorn, Tim Altman and others
Defendant:
Experian Holdings, Inc. and Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Brown v. Solomon et al
as 5:2015cv00066
Plaintiff:
Marshall Lee Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
George T. Solomon, Betty Brown, Swindell Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
