Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Hill v. Kijakazi
as 5:2021cv00487
Plaintiff:
Matthew Danny Hill
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Hill v. Kalahari Resorts PA, LLC
as 3:2021cv01036
Plaintiff:
Danny Hill
Defendant:
Kalahari Resorts PA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Bennie Adams, et al v. Richard Michael DeWine, et al
as 21-3330
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DOUGLAS L. COLEY, DENNY OBERMILLER, JASON ROBB and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
VON CLARK DAVIS, CALVIN MCKELTON, ASHFORD THOMPSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, EDWIN C. VOORHIES, JR., Managing Director of Operations, ODRC, MIKE DEWINE, Governor, State of Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
BENNIE ADAMS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION
Hill v. Shoop
as 4:2020cv01294
Petitioner:
Danny Hill
Respondent:
Warden Timothy Shoop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv03376
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANNY HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Complete Property Restoration and Winterizing, LLC v. Hill, et al
as 5:2018cv00574
Defendant:
PRIMUSEV LLC and DANNY HILL
Plaintiff:
COMPLETE PROPERTY RESTORATION AND WINTERIZING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
GUICE et al v. DIRECTV, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv03379
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GUICE , STEVEN SCOTT , THOMAS PEDICORD and others
Defendant:
DIRECTV, LLC and DIRECTSAT, USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Danny Hill-Bey v. Dushan Zatecky
as 17-2360
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANNY HILL-BEY
Respondent - Appellee:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, Superintendent
Hill-Bey v. United States et al
as 1:2016cv00116
Plaintiff:
Danny Hill-Bey
Defendant:
United States, Wayne Seybold, Scott Haley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
