Cases 1 - 10 of 14
THOMPSON v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00942
Plaintiff:
DARRYL THOMPSON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv03627
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DARRYL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMPSON v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv00233
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
DARRYL THOMPSON
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Murphy et al v. First Student Management LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01966
Plaintiff:
Eddy Murphy , Jr , Brittany Vimpeny , Brenda Brown and others
Defendant:
First Student Management LLC and First Student, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
James v. Case et al
as 3:2016cv00126
Plaintiff:
Paul R. James, Jr.
Defendant:
David Case, Darryl Thompson and James Corrigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes et al v. F.S.P. Security et al
as 3:2014cv01327
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes and Roderick Moss
Defendant:
F.S.P. Security and Officer R. Darryl Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Taylor
as 3:2013cv00601
Petitioner:
Darryl Thompson
Respondent:
Felix C. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thompson v. Pendergrass et al
as 3:2011cv00654
Plaintiff:
Darryl Thompson
Defendant:
Samantha Pendergrass, Keith Early and ReKesia Anderson
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Jerry Youngbey, et al v. DC, et al
as 11-7033
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jerry Youngbey and Rubin Butler
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia
Defendant - Appellant:
Darin March, Det., Christopher Smith, Officer, Jose Acosta, Officer and others
Alonzo Johnson, et al v. Claude Finn, et al
as 10-15641
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALONZO DEON JOHNSON and DARRYL THOMPSON
Respondent - Appellee:
CLAUDE E. FINN, Warden, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and TOM L. CAREY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
