Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Anderson et al v. Raoul et al
as 3:2023cv00728
Plaintiff:
Carlin Anderson and Dave Clark
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Brendan F. Kelly, Craig Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alfonso Munoz Alegria v. Dave Clark
as 5:2022cv01992
Petitioner:
Alfonso Munoz Alegria
Respondent:
Dave Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alegria v. Clark
as 3:2022cv01731
Petitioner:
Alfonso Munoz Alegria
Respondent:
Dave Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Collins v. Clark
as 1:2021cv01585
Petitioner:
Alphonso Collins
Respondent:
Dave Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barnes v. Orozco et al
as 3:2021cv03658
Defendant:
Allie Rasmussen, Sal Castaneda, Rosemary Orozco and others
Petitioner:
Antoine Deshawn Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Fred Clark, Jr.
as 16-10811
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRED DAVIS CLARK, JR., a.k.a. Dave Clark
McGruder v. McCoy et al
as 3:2015cv01416
Plaintiff:
Ronald McGruder
Defendant:
Juan B McCoy, Dave Clark, Philip Delaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON et al v. LOWNDES COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 7:2014cv00158
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JOHNSON and JACQUELYN JOHNSON
Defendant:
LOWNDES COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION , FRED WETHERINGTON , MIKE DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Securities & Exchange Comm. v. Barry Graham, et al
as 14-13562
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellee:
BARRY J. GRAHAM, FRED DAVIS CLARK, JR., a.k.a. Dave Clark, CRISTAL R. COLEMAN, a.k.a. Cristal Clark and others
Amicus Curiae:
SECURITIES INDUSTRY AND FINANCIAL MARKETS ASSOCIATION
Harmon v. Clark et al (TVV)
as 3:2013cv00592
Plaintiff:
James Howard Harmon, Jr.
Defendant:
Dave Clark, Ryan M Spitzer, Brian Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
