Cases 1 - 10 of 12
ATKINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv13814
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID KEITH ATKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Atkin
as 10-2152
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Richard A. Williams and Bryan Williams
Defendant:
Ryan D. Fortini, Individually and as an employee of the New York State Police and New York State Police
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
David W. Atkins, individually and as an employee of the New York State Police
Williams v. Atkin
as 10-1946
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Richard A. Williams and Bryan Williams
Defendant:
Ryan D. Fortini, Individually and as an employee of the New York State Police and New York State Police
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
David W. Atkins, individually and as an employee of the New York State Police
Atkins v. Salazar
as 1:2010cv00040
Plaintiff:
David A. Atkins
Defendant:
Ken Salazar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
David Atkins v. Claude Combs, et al
as 09-3382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID SOLOMON ATKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
CLAUDE COMBS, Sheriff, MIKE AGAN, Jailer and MIKE PALAO
ATKINS v. COMBS
as 4:2008cv00202
Plaintiff:
DAVID SOLOMON ATKINS
Defendant:
TODD COMBS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ATKINS v. COMBS et al
as 4:2008cv00053
Plaintiff:
DAVID SOLOMON ATKINS
Defendant:
CLAUDE COMBS, MIKE AGAN and WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Atkins v. Kempthorne
as 1:2007cv00314
Plaintiff:
David A. Atkins
Defendant:
Dirk Kempthorne
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Cabrera et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2007cv06924
Plaintiff:
Ralph Cabrera and Reina M. Cabrera
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Mara S Georges, Myriam Zreczny Kasper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
