Cases 31 - 40 of 261
Raul Hernandez v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 19-55027
Defendant / Appellee:
M. PAYTON, Correctional Captain at Ironwood State Prison, in his individual capacity and official capacity, S. L. PALMER, Correctional Sergeant, in his/her individual capacity and official capacity, B. ARNESON, Correctional Counselor II, in his/her individual capacity and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAUL HERNANDEZ
Long v. Polonsky et al
as 6:2018cv01798
Respondent:
Marion County Corrections, Jeff Wood and Sophie P. Polonsky
Petitioner:
David Benjamin Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ouma v. Asher et al
as 3:2018cv00888
Defendant:
Tyler Asher, Katherine Morton Law Office, Liberty Mutual Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Washie Ouma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. David Long
as 18-4055
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID SHAUN LONG
USA v. Long et al
as 6:2018cv00022
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
David Michael Long, Mary Sue Long and Unknown Occupants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Long v. Hall et al
as 4:2018cv00001
Petitioner:
David Heath Long
Respondent:
Hilton Hall and Commissioner of the Georgia Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Canada, Sr. v. David Long, et al
as 17-16848
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD CANADA, Sr.
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID B. LONG, Warden and NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden
James Edward Canada v. David B. Long et al
as 3:2017cv03812
Petitioner:
James Edward Canada, Sr.
Respondent:
David B. Long and Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Edward Canada v. David B. Long et al
as 2:2017cv04536
Petitioner:
James Edward Canada, Sr.
Respondent:
David B. Long and Neil McDowell
Long v. AbbVie, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04594
Plaintiff:
David A Long
Defendant:
AbbVie, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Inc, AbbVie Products, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
