Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Champagne v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 2:2023cv03721
Plaintiff:
David Champagne
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Anthony Rufo, et al v. Idee Fox, et al
as 21-3318
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY M. RUFO, individually and as sole member of 325 S. 18t Street, LLC and 325 S 18TH STREET LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE IDEE FOX, JUDGE POWELL J. KENNETH, JR., ORPHANIDES & TONER LLP and others
RUFO et al v. FOX et al
as 2:2021cv02861
Plaintiff:
325 S. 18TH STREET, LLC and ANTHONY M. RUFO
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COALITION, ORPHANIDES & TONER, LLP, A.G. JOSH SHAPIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lexington Insurance Company v. GERSBECK et al
as 4:2018cv10118
Defendant:
M&M VENTURES INC., DAVID CHAMPAGNE, ISLAMORADA ASSET MANAGEMENT INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Lexington Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ISABELLA v. CHAMPAGNE et al
as 2:2017cv02028
Plaintiff:
TERESA ISABELLA
Defendant:
DAVID CHAMPAGNE, PHILADELPHIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COALITION, CHARLES J. WALSH, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GERSBECK v. ISLAMORADA ASSET MANAGEMENT INC.
as 4:2016cv10026
Plaintiff:
NICOLE GERSBECK
Defendant:
ISLAMORADA ASSET MANAGEMENT INC., THE RECEIVERSHIP OF ISLAMORADA ASSET MANAGEMENT INC., DAVID CHAMPAGNE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Mary Quartey v. Eric
as 10-1145
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY AKU QUARTEY
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC, Mr. (Tour 3 Head Manager), J. D. JACKSON, Mr. (T3), DAVID CHAMPAGNE, Mr. and others
Quartey v. Potter et al
as 8:2010cv00046
Plaintiff:
Mary Aku Quartey
Defendant:
John E. Potter, John E. Potter, Mr. Eric (Tour 3 Head Manager) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
