Cases 11 - 20 of 337
Young et al v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2023cv01786
Plaintiff:
Brittian Willie Young, Sr. and Open Entry Services
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Unknown Party, Misael Cabrera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Depuydt #294943 v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08287
Plaintiff:
David G Depuydt
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Johnson v. Nunez et al
as 2:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Alex Bernard Johnson
Defendant:
Juan J. Nunez, Jerry J. Sanchez, Placido Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Nunez et al
as 1:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Alex Bernard Johnson
Defendant:
Juan J. Nunez, Jerry J. Sanchez, Placido Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harold Staffney v. Stephen Cole, et al
as 23-1149
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAROLD STAFFNEY
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN D. COHLE, BLODGETT MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER, KENNETH KOOLSTRA and others
Staffney v. Cole et al
as 2:2022cv12820
Plaintiff:
Harold Staffney
Defendant:
Stephen D. Cole, Blodgett Memorial Medical Center, Kenneth Kooistor and others
Hollett v. Hunt et al
as 2:2022cv01794
Plaintiff:
David G. Hollett
Defendant:
Hunt, Reubart and Cooke
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections and Aaron D. Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bates v. Ogg et al
as 4:2022cv03294
Plaintiff:
Nicholaus Cinque Bates
Defendant:
Kim Ogg and David G. Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Boyd
as 2:2022cv00081
Petitioner:
David G. Jenkins
Respondent:
Bert Boyld
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
