Cases 1 - 10 of 166
Mohammed v. Pallmeyer et al
as 1:2024cv02382
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Defendant:
Chief Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer, Judge Ana Reyes, Judge Christopher Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Carr v. Swatzel et al
as 4:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Daniel Carr
Defendant:
A Swatzel and David Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peter Allan, Sr., et al v. Minnesota DHS, et al
as 24-1329
Plaintiff:
Peter Allan, Sr., Russell Hatton, Michael D. Benson and others
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Jodi Harpstead, in her official capacity as Commissioner of Department of Human Services, Marshall Smith, in his official capacity as Chief Executive Director of Direct Care and Treatment for the Minnesota Sex Offender Program and others
Abdul Mohammed v. Frank Easterbrook, et al
as 23-5293
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Abdul Azeem Mohammed
Defendant / Appellee:
Frank Easterbrook, Hon., Vanita Gupta, Merrick B. Garland and others
Hamilton v. Son
as 23-3805
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID HAMILTON
Defendant / Appellee:
M. SON, Doctor
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Rigney v. Hamilton
as 4:2023cv00939
Plaintiff:
Rex Rigney
Defendant:
Doe and David Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMILTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13028
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAVID HAMILTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MOHAMMED v. EASTERBROOK et al
as 1:2023cv02003
Plaintiff:
ABDUL MOHAMMED
Defendant:
FRANK EASTERBROOK, VANITA GUPTA, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
