Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Michael Womack v. Carroll County, Georgia, et al
as 20-10128
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID JORDAN, CRAIG DODSON, GERALD PILGRIM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL WOMACK
SANDLIN et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03073
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER KLINE, DARRELL WEBSTER, MICHAEL GONZALEZ and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Langley v. Langley et al
as 3:2019cv00100
Plaintiff:
Garry Shawn Langley
Defendant:
Captain Shane Taylor, Sheriff Terry Langley and Major David Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fletcher v. Langley et al
as 3:2019cv00089
Defendant:
Six Unknown Deputy Sheriffs, Captain Shane Taylor, Sheriff Terry Langley and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Scott Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Womack v. Carroll County, Georgia et al
as 3:2019cv00032
Plaintiff:
Michael Womack
Defendant:
Carroll County, Georgia, Gerald Pilgrim, Craig Dodson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019mc03857
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Garnishee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
JORDAN v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv00117
Plaintiff:
DAVID JORDAN
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phoenix v. Canvas, Inc. et al
as 1:2016mi00108
Plaintiff:
David Phoenix
Defendant:
Canvas, Inc., David Jordan and Alex F. Nesmith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Dwight Jordan v. Secretary, Department of Corre, et al
as 16-15421
Petitioner - Appellant:
DWIGHT DAVID JORDAN
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Jordan v. National Retail Properties Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01370
Plaintiff:
David Jordan
Defendant:
National Retail Properties Inc. and John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
