Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Shore v. Zornig et al
as 3:2023cv00951
Plaintiff:
David W Shore and David Wayne Shore
Defendant:
Teresa Zornig and Kenneth Downs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JORDAN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2023cv07040
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEE JORDAN and DAVID W. JORDAN
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nail v. Tarlton et al
as 1:2023cv00247
Plaintiff:
David William Nail and David W Nail
Defendant:
Scott Lee Tarlton and Brent Parson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 Violation of Emerg Med Treatment & Active Labor Act
PADGETT v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. PADGETT
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
LEE v. MYERS
as 1:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. LEE
Defendant:
MATTHEW MYERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEE JR v. MYERS
as 1:2022cv02310
Plaintiff:
DAVID W LEE JR
Defendant:
MATTHEW MYERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LINDER v. MILLIKIN UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2021cv00456
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. LINDER
Defendant:
MILLIKIN UNIVERSITY, W. THAD KUHFUSS, JAMES WARNING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WILKINSON v. WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 1:2021cv02731
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. WILKINSON
Defendant:
WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES, CENTURION MEDICAL SERVICES, GEO GROUP INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILKINSON v. WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES INC. OF IND. et al
as 1:2021cv02051
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. WILKINSON
Defendant:
WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES INC. OF IND., MARK SEVIER, ROBERT CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHAMORRO v. NEAL
as 1:2021cv01206
Petitioner:
DAVID W LEWARCHIK and RAY CHAMORRO
Respondent:
Warden RON NEAL and RON NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
