Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-4990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
King v. Williams, DDS et al
as 1:2026cv04733
Plaintiff:
Ebony King
Defendant:
Colin E. Williams, DDS and Community Healthcare Network, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
DD Traders, Inc. v. United States of America et al
as 1:2026cv03471
Plaintiff:
DD Traders, Inc. doing business as DEMDACO
Defendant:
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Rodney S. Scott, in his official capacity as Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and United States of America
Defense Distributed, et al v. John Elik, et al
as 26-12667
Plaintiff:
DEFENSE DISTRIBUTED, DD FOUNDATION, LLC. and DEFCAD, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN ELIK, MATTHEW LAROSIERE, ALEXANDER HOLLADAY and others
Stewart v. Malmandier
as 26-2058
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER STEWART
Defendant:
Ms. MALMANDIER, Supervisor, Middletown DDS and DAPHNE, after hours phone operator
Travis McCrae v. Dr. Griffin
as 26-1973
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS MCCRAE, a/k/a Travis McCrea, a/k/a Travis McCrae
Defendant:
DR. GRIFFIN, DDS and AFLAC INSURANCE COMPANY
FREEDLAND v. ELAVON, INC. et al
as 1:2026cv00717
Plaintiff:
DR. ROBERT D. FREEDLAND, DDS, P.A.
Defendant:
ELAVON, INC. and PAYCHEX, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Wells Fargo Bank v. Villaruel et al
as 3:2026cv02091
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
Defendant:
Oliver Sanchez Villaruel and Oliver S. Villaruel, DDS, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jeffrey J Henneberg v. Delta Dental of Washington
as 2:2026cv02185
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey J Henneberg DDS PC
Defendant:
Delta Dental of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Design Gaps, Inc. v. Davide Olivieri
as 26-1783
Plaintiff:
DESIGN GAPS, INC. and DAVID GLOVER
Defendant:
DAVIDE OLIVIERI, DORIANA OLIVIERI, DD LUXE DESIGN, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
