Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Deaton v. Iowa Department of Health and Human Services
as 3:2026cv00049
Plaintiff:
Jack Deaton
Defendant:
Iowa Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Thompson v. Jakes et al
as 2:2026cv02086
Plaintiff:
Mr. Lee Otis Thompson
Defendant:
Corporal Shayla Jakes, Sheriff Solam Duane Lewis and Officer Deputy Deaton John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. - Americans with Disabilities Act
Deaton v. Roberts
as 6:2026cv00141
Plaintiff:
Charles Timothy Deaton
Defendant:
Tara Chadwell Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Deaton et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv03581
Plaintiff:
Christopher Deaton
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nicholas Deaton v. Christopher Flippin
as 26-11417
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS DEATON
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER FLIPPIN, in his individual and official capacities
Deaton v. Warrington
as 5:2026cv03145
Plaintiff:
Taylor Deaton
Defendant:
Warrington Beijon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
WULFFEN DEATON v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv01948
Plaintiff:
CHRISTA WULFFEN DEATON
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Greenberg v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore et al
as 1:2026cv00690
Plaintiff:
Joshua Greenberg
Defendant:
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, Megan Deaton, Latora Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Bradley Deaton, et al v. United States
as 26-1116
Plaintiff:
Bradley Deaton and Raymond Hatten
Cross-Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cross-Defendant:
Jantran, Inc. and Bruce Oakley, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
