Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01941
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DECA FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC et al v. ECMC GROUP,INC. et al
as 1:2013cv01222
Defendant: SHANE ARCHER, RICHARD J. BOYLE, GARY M. COOK and others
Plaintiff: DECA FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC and TODD WOLFE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv00070
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00636
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Earp v. Pendrick Capital Partners, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv02934
Plaintiff: Denise Earp
Defendant: Pendrick Capital Partners, LLC and DECA Financial Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01587
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Fair v. DECA Financial Services, LLC
as 1:2013cv01508
Defendant: DECA Financial Services, LLC
Plaintiff: Tamara Fair
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00004
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01514
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Walbaum v. DECA Financial Services, LLC et al
as 6:2012cv00328
Plaintiff: Melanie Walbaum
Defendant: DECA Financial Services, LLC, National Bureau of Collections, Inc., Professional Account Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?