Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Wade et al v. Carter et al
as 2:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Augusta "Gus" Wade and Glenda Wade
Defendant:
Kenneth Carter and DHL Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv05971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Almont Ambulatory Surgery Center LLC et al v. UnitedHealth Group Inc et al
as 2:2014cv02139
Defendant:
Wolverine Worldwide Flexible Spending Account Plan, Monrovia Nursery Company Employee Benefit Plan, Future Electronics Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
West Hills Surgery Center LLC, San Joaquin Valley Surgery Center LLC, Palmdale Surgery Center LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Baez Romero v. DHL Express Inc et al
as 1:2012cv01942
Plaintiff:
Mauricio Baez Romero
Defendant:
DHL Express Inc and Local 295 I.B.T.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
NLRB v. DHL Express, Inc.
as 12-1143
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
DHL Express, Inc.
DHL Express, Inc. v. NLRB
as 12-1072
Petitioner:
DHL Express, Inc.
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Weiss v. DPWN Holdings (USA), Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv10076
Plaintiff:
Jeremy M. Weiss
Defendant:
DPWN Holdings (USA), Inc. and DHL Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Paladino v. DHL Express Inc.
as 10-1649
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dino Paladino
Defendant - Appellee:
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Air Freight Chauffers, Handlers, Warehousemen & Allied Workers Union No. 295 and DHL Express Inc., (USA)
Weiss v. DHL Express, Inc.
as 1:2010cv10705
Defendant:
DHL Express, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jeremy M. Weiss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Default
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
