Cases 1 - 10 of 101
Williamson v. State of North Dakota et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Robert Williamson
Defendant:
State of North Dakota, Chad Pringle, Dave Krabbenhoft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Bradburn et al
as 7:2023cv00469
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Banks
Defendant:
CO Bradburn, CO Smallwood, CO Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Andrew Fields, III v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 23-6246
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW FIELDS, III
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN STREEVAL, A. W. GOLDEY and others
Santiago v. Streeval et al
as 7:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Marcos F. Santiago
Defendant:
J. C. Streeval, Dye, Calton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Washington v. Streeval et al
as 7:2022cv00550
Plaintiff:
Daryl Vincent Xzavier Washington and Darryl Washington
Defendant:
J. C. Streeval, Ledford, Mullins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Fields v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Andrew Fields, III
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden Streeval, A.W. Goldey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
DICKENSON v. CLINTON COUNTY JAIL INDIANA
as 1:2021cv02951
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE DICKENSON
Defendant:
CLINTON COUNTY JAIL INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickenson v. Clinton County Jail Indianan
as 4:2021cv00076
Plaintiff:
David Lee Dickenson
Defendant:
Clinton County Jail Indiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kearney v. French et al
as 2:2020cv00578
Defendant:
Brandie French, Eastern State Hospital and Cheri Dickenson
Plaintiff:
Carlton Kearney, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01893
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
