Cases 71 - 80 of 206
HAMILTON v. LOWE et al
as 1:2017cv01977
Plaintiff:
JAN B. HAMILTON
Defendant:
JENNIFER LOWE, OFFICERS AND TRUSTEES OF THE SUPREME COURT HISTORICAL SOCIETY, RALPH I. LANCASTER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pamela Scott v. Colin Hayes, et al
as 17-35682
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAMELA K. SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
COLIN HAYES, ANNA KLEIN, ANNE CRUSE, in their individual and professional capacities and others
Scott v. Hayes et al
as 3:2017cv05619
Plaintiff:
Pamela K Scott
Defendant:
Colin Hayes, Anna Klein, Anne Cruse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARVEY v. CALDWELL et al
as 1:2017cv05584
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND DWAYNE HARVEY
Defendant:
EUGENE J. CALDWELL, II, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickering v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv05760
Defendant:
City Of New York, Joseph Ponte, John/Jane Doe AMKC Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Shindell Pickering
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foy v. Pulaski County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2017cv00358
Plaintiff:
Kevin Foy
Defendant:
Pulaski County, Arkansas , Doc Holladay , Austin Callahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tassinari v. Secretary, DOC et al
as 2:2017cv00287
Petitioner:
Brian E. Tassinari
Respondent:
Secretary, DOC and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madison v. Connecticut State DOC
as 3:2017cv00545
Plaintiff:
Jack Madison, Jr.
Defendant:
Connecticut State DOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatton v. Pulaski County Sheriff Department et al
as 4:2017cv00099
Plaintiff:
Elexas Hatton
Defendant:
Pulaski County Sheriff Department , Doc Holladay, Michael Graff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
