Cases 11 - 20 of 2,468
Donald Vaughan v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 24-6290
Petitioner:
DONALD DOC VAUGHAN
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Morales v. MN DOC et al
as 0:2024cv01091
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Morales
Defendant:
MN DOC, MCF - Faribault, Jodi Atinsted and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennis Busby v. Doris Falkenrath, et al
as 24-1653
Plaintiff:
Dennis L. Busby
Defendant:
Doris Falkenrath, Warden, JCCC, Andrea Galbreath, Sergeant, JCCC, MO DOC and Ike, Corrections Officer, MO DOC
Moore v. Warden Oliver et al
as 2:2024cv00576
Plaintiff:
Allan Moore
Defendant:
Warden Oliver, Chief Witmore, O.M.D. and Director Dzurenda, Doc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Desmarais v. Washington State DOC et al
as 1:2024cv03011
Plaintiff:
John Michael Desmarais
Defendant:
Washington State DOC, Klickitat County Sheriffs Office, Gillaim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. DOC Commissioner et al
as 1:2024mc00084
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
DOC Commissioner and Shane Troxler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antiona Phillips v. Donald Compton, et al
as 24-1575
Plaintiff:
Antiona Lee Phillips
Defendant:
Donald Compton, Rehab Program Manager, ADC, Pierce, Mental Health Advocate Supervisor, ADC, Dexter Payne, Chief Assistant Deputy Director, DOC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Levi Springer v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6229
Petitioner:
LEVI GARY SPRINGER
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of VA DOC
Ferrell (PS) v. Gang Stalkers et al
as 1:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Dennis J. Ferrell
Defendant:
Gang Stalkers, City/County Jail and DOC Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
