Other Statutory Actions Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
ASGN Incorporated et al v. Highland Federal, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00294
Claimant: Highland Federal, LLC, ECS Federal Holding Co., Kapani Family 2012 Irrevocable Trust and others
Interpleader: ASGN Incorporated and ECS Federal LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Bruce v. Equifax Information Solutions, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv03603
Plaintiff: Nelson L. Bruce
Defendant: Equifax Information Solutions, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., TransUnion, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
YANG et al v. MARKET AMERICA, INC., et al
as 1:2019cv00502
Plaintiff: OLLIE LAN, CHUANJIE YANG, LIU LIU and others
Defendant: MARKET AMERICA WORLDWIDE INC., MARC ASHLEY, JAMES HOWARD RIDINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Gosselin Worldwide Moving, N.V
as 17-2110
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES EX REL KURT BUNK, UNITED STATES EX REL. DANIEL HEUSER and UNITED STATES EX REL RAY AMMONS
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: BIRKART GLOBISTICS GMBH & CO. LOGISTIK UND SERVICE KG, THE PASHA GROUP, ITO MOBEL TRANSPORT GMBH and others
Garnishee: GOVERNMENT LOGISTICS N.V., Belcrownlaan 23 Antwerp 2100 Belgium Government Logistics, N.V.
United States of America v. Gosselin Worldwide Moving, N.V
as 17-2110
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES EX REL KURT BUNK, UNITED STATES EX REL. DANIEL HEUSER and UNITED STATES EX REL RAY AMMONS
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee: GOSSELIN WORLDWIDE MOVING, N.V., VIKTORIA INTERNATIONAL SPEDITION, GOSSELIN WORLD WIDE MOVING GMBH and others
Defendant: BIRKART GLOBISTICS GMBH & CO. LOGISTIK UND SERVICE KG, THE PASHA GROUP, ITO MOBEL TRANSPORT GMBH and others
Garnishee - Appellee: GOVERNMENT LOGISTICS N.V., Belcrownlaan 23 Antwerp 2100 Belgium Government Logistics, N.V.
United States ex rel Kurt Bunk v. Gosselin Worldwide Moving, N.V
as 17-2102
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES EX REL KURT BUNK
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES EX REL DANIEL HEUSER and UNITED STATES EX REL RAY AMMONS
Intervenor/Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee: GOSSELIN WORLDWIDE MOVING, N.V., VIKTORIA INTERNATIONAL SPEDITION, GOSSELIN WORLD WIDE MOVING GMBH and others
Defendant: BIRKART GLOBISTICS GMBH & CO. LOGISTIK UND SERVICE KG, THE PASHA GROUP, ITO MOBEL TRANSPORT GMBH and others
Garnishee - Appellee: GOVERNMENT LOGISTICS N.V., Belcrownlaan 23 Antwerp 2100 Belgium Government Logistics, N.V.
Middleton v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01084
Plaintiff: Ervin Middleton
Defendant: Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC, Atlantic Law Group, LLC and Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
US v. Government Logistics N.V.
as 15-1207
Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES EX REL. KURT BUNK AND RAY AMMONS and UNITED STATES EX REL. DANIEL HEUSER
Defendant - Appellee: GOVERNMENT LOGISTICS N.V., MARC SMET and GOSSELIN WORLD WIDE MOVING, N.V.
Defendant: BIRKART GLOBISTICS GMBH & CO. LOGISTIK UND SERVICE KG, THE PASHA GROUP, ANDREAS CHRIST SPEDITION & MOBELTRANSPORT GMBH and others
US ex rel. Kurt Bunk v. Gosselin World Wide Moving We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1088
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES EX REL. KURT BUNK AND RAY AMMONS
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES EX REL. DANIEL HEUSER
Defendant - Appellee: GOSSELIN WORLDWIDE MOVING, N.V., GOSSELIN GROUP N.V., GOVERNMENT LOGISTICS N.V. and others
Defendant: BIRKART GLOBISTICS GMBH & CO. LOGISTIK UND SERVICE KG, THE PASHA GROUP, ANDREAS CHRIST SPEDITION & MOBELTRANSPORT GMBH and others
:
Pridgeon et al v. Pegram et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00467
Petitioner: Lee Ann Pridgeon , L.I.G.Services, Inc. and John Does 1-100
Respondent: Rick Ryan Pegram , Debra R. Pegram and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?