Cases 51 - 60 of 222
Standard Process Inc. v. Galeev, Irek et al
as 3:2019cv00710
Plaintiff:
Standard Process Inc.
Defendant:
Irek Galeev, Vita EEP LLC and John Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Standard Process Inc. v. Levy, Danny et al
as 3:2019cv00709
Plaintiff:
Standard Process Inc.
Defendant:
John Does 1-100 and Danny Levy
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
CURT Manufacturing, LLC v. Howard Auto Parts Corporation et al
as 3:2019cv00589
Defendant:
John Does 1-100 and Howard Auto Parts Corporation
Plaintiff:
CURT Manufacturing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Evelyn et al v. Johnson Publishing Company, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv04060
Plaintiff:
Petra Alexandra, Inc. and Vanessa P.A. Evelyn
Defendant:
Desiree G Rogers, Macy's Inc., Johnson Publishing Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03570
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Mark Hughes v. Robert Carter, et al
as 19-1967
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT E. CARTER, Comm., KEITH BUTTS, Warden, DOES 1-100 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK S. HUGHES
CURT Manufacturing, LLC v. Fikany, Michael et al
as 3:2019cv00389
Defendant:
Michael Fikany and John Does 1-100
Plaintiff:
CURT Manufacturing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
HUGHES v. CARTER et al
as 1:2019cv01809
Defendant:
DOES 1-100, CARL KUENZLI, ROBERT E. CARTER and others
Plaintiff:
MARK S. HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonchek v. Nicolet Unified School District et al
as 2:2019cv00425
Defendant:
Myra Taxman, Estate of David R. Johnson, Nicolet High School and others
Plaintiff:
Mark S Bonchek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sawicki v. Greene et al
as 1:2019cv01736
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Sawicki, II
Defendant:
Martin J. Coleman, Courtney Ann Greene and John and Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
