Cases 1 - 10 of 69
SPRADLIN et al v. TOBY et al
as 5:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
LISA SPRADLIN
Defendant:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY, DEPUTY WARDEN GEORGE IVEY, OFFICER STEPHANIE MACKLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Turley v. City of South Charleston et al
as 2:2022cv00249
Plaintiff:
Jamie Brian Turley
Defendant:
The City of South Charleston, Justin Bailes, Aaron Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALVORSEN v. HASBROUCK HEIGHTS POLICE DEPT. et al
as 2:2022cv01685
Plaintiff:
SEAN HALVORSEN
Defendant:
HASBROUCK HEIGHTS POLICE DEPT., POLICE CHEIF MICHAEL COLANERI and OFFICERS JOHN AND JANE DOE 1 TO 5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Diaz et al
as 3:2021cv02053
Plaintiff:
Kerry Roberts
Defendant:
Diaz, Peterson, -, Markos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv02019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Smith v. City of New Yok et al
as 1:2021cv06012
Plaintiff:
Liam Smith
Defendant:
City of New Yok, Jason Velez, Bakar McDuffie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Chavez v. King et al
as 3:2021cv00354
Defendant:
Commissioner Pelecia E. Hall, John Does 1 through 5, Superintendent Ron King and others
Plaintiff:
Yvette M. Chavez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. King et al
as 3:2021cv00355
Plaintiff:
Alex R. Torres
Defendant:
John Does 1 through 5, C.O. Unknown Lacey, Commissioner Pelecia E. Hall and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
