Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Kasserman v. Duncan et al
as 2:2023cv04017
Plaintiff:
David Kasserman
Defendant:
Donald Duncan, Kenneth Ward, Brent Hendricks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duncan et al v. C.R.Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00770
Plaintiff:
Kimberly D. Duncan and Donald Duncan
Defendant:
C.R.Bard, Inc. and DAVOL, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gregory Brown v. Richard Morgan, et al
as 22-35884
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY TYREE BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD L. MORGAN, BERNARD WARNER, SCOTT FRAKES and others
Clark et al v. Duncan et al
as 3:2021cv00242
Plaintiff:
Clairmont Morrison and Richard Clark
Defendant:
Ryan Stock, JOHN DOES 1-20, Tan Oak Financial and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
DUNCAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv05703
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD DUNCAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUNCAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv01254
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
DONALD DUNCAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alternative Health Care Advoc., et al v. CIR
as 19-73169
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEREMY S. KWIT, ALTERNATIVE HEALTH CARE ADVOCATES and DONALD DUNCAN, AKA Don Duncan, AKA Don D. Duncan
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
MCCLAIN et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03126
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS HAGER, JOSHUA WIKHOLM, DANNY BRADEN and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McClain et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02060
Plaintiff:
Travis Hager, Joshua Wikholm, Danny Braden and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Paramjit Basra v. Richard Morgan, et al
as 19-35190
Defendant / Appellee:
C. APLIN, C/O, DONALD DUNCAN, Chaplain, MIKE OBENLAND, Supt of Monroe Correctional Complex and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PARAMJIT SINGH BASRA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
