Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv07028
Plaintiff:
Donald Johnson
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Douglas Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dunn v. State of Louisiana, Through the Department of Public Safety and Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00425
Defendant:
Asst. Warden Kirt Guerain, Asst. Sgt. Joebert, Sgt. Unknown Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Shawn Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Price v. Irons et al
as 2:2019cv11451
Defendant:
Susan C Kalmbach, Donald Johnson, Quiana M Hunt and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv02402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Batiste-Swilley v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2017cv00443
Defendant:
Dustin Brown, Robert Holmes, Raymond Klug and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Batiste-Swilley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Yarbrough et al
as 6:2017cv00557
Plaintiff:
Larry Donald Johnson
Defendant:
Steven Yarbrough , Debrian Sudduth and Parrish, Town of, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv05889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2
Evans, et al v. State of Utah, et al
as 14-4060
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JONELL EVANS, STACIA IRELAND, MARINA GOMBERG and others
Defendant - Appellant:
STATE OF UTAH, GARY HERBERT, in his official capacity as Governor of Utah and SEAN REYES, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Utah
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
