Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Woods et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-11993
Plaintiff:
Susan Lynn Woods and Brian Donald Woods
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Woods et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv11993
Plaintiff:
Susan Lynn Woods and Brian Donald Woods
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tafari v. Bellnier
as 13-1481
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Injah Tafari
Defendant - Appellee:
Joseph Bellnier, Superintendent, Michael Sheahan, Deputy Superintendent, Donald Uhler, Deputy Superintendent and others
Tafari v. Baker
as 13-1479
Defendant:
Maureen Bosco, from 9:11-cv-1476, George Waterson, 9:11-cv-1429, Jason Ferrick, from 12-cv-662 and others
Appellee:
Richard Roy, from 9:12-cv-269, Brian Fischer, Commissioner, Thomas Quinn, from 9:11-cv-1390 and others
Appellant:
Injah Tafari
Tafari v. Bellnier
as 13-318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Injah Tafari
Defendant - Appellee:
Joseph Bellnier, Superintendent, Michael Sheahan, Deputy Superintendent, Donald Uhler, Deputy Superintendent and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv09274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Woods v. Gill
as 1:2012cv01737
Petitioner:
Donald Woods
Respondent:
A. Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wood et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2012cv02972
Plaintiff:
Susan Wood and Donald Wood
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv01642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
