Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Green v. Stogner et al
as 5:2018cv00067
Plaintiff:
Marcus P. Green
Defendant:
James Stogner, III, Donald Young, DeEdre Hert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young (ID 74516) v. Geither
as 5:2017cv03005
Plaintiff:
Donald Young
Defendant:
Gloria Geither
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barry v. Cumberland County Jail, et al
as 16-2466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL MICHAEL BARRY
Defendant - Appellee:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL, EDITH WOODWARD, RALPH DUBOIS and others
Defendant:
CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES
Gresham v. Pope et al
as 5:2015cv00259
Plaintiff:
Dillon J. Gresham
Defendant:
Willard Pope, Amy Beth Berndt, Maria L. Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Director Wall
as 1:2014cv00469
Petitioner:
Donald Young
Respondent:
Director Wall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Deemer v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 13-1986
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MARTIN DEEMER
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, Former Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, in his individual capacity, DONALD YOUNG, Records Oficer, SCI-Mahanoy, in his individual capacity, CATHERINE C. MCVEY, Former Chairperson, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, in her individual capacity and others
Michael Reynolds v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor
as 12-4536
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL REYNOLDS
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SCI MAHANOY, JEFFREY BEARD and others
YOUNG v. LAPPIN et al
as 5:2011hc02103
Petitioner:
Theodore Donald Young
Respondent:
Harley G. Lappin, Sara Revell and Tracy W. Johns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
YOUNG v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2011cv00794
Petitioner:
THEODORE DONALD YOUNG
Respondent:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, SARA REVELL and TRACY W. JOHNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Donald Young v. Kenny Atkins, et al
as 10-12687
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD YOUNG
Respondent - Appellee:
KENNY ATKINS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
