Cases 1 - 10 of 68
BIGHAM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv09527
Plaintiff:
DALE LEE BIGHAM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WALKER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21680
Plaintiff:
DALE LEE WALKER, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Waldroupe v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv00288
Petitioner:
Dale Lee Waldroupe, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
JARRELL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13104
Plaintiff:
DALE LEE JARRELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lee v. Craft et al
as 2:2022cv00989
Plaintiff:
Wendolyn Lee and Wendolyn Dale Lee
Defendant:
Chris Craft, Amy Weirich, Carrolyn Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradford v. Love
as 4:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
Jerri Dawn Bradford
Defendant:
Dale Lee Love
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lee v. USA
as 2:2022cv00093
Petitioner:
Brian Dale Lee
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Kadoun v. Nationwide Insurance Company et al
as 3:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Dale Lee Kadoun
Defendant:
Nationwide Insurance Company, Does 1 thorugh 20 and Does 1 through 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 bc
Askari Lumumba v. Jeffrey Kiser
as 21-7512
Petitioner / Appellant:
ASKARI DANSO MS LUMUMBA, f/k/a Dale Lee Pughsley
Respondent / Appellee:
JEFFREY KISER
Dale Pughsley v. A. Robinson
as 21-7326
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DALE LEE PUGHSLEY, a/k/a Askari Danso MS Lumumba
Defendant / Appellee:
A. DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Corrections, Each individually and in his official capacity, JAMILLA BURNEY-DIVINS, Each individually and in her official capacity, GREGORY HOLLOWAY, Each individually and in his official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
