Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Peter Allan, Sr., et al v. Minnesota DHS, et al
as 24-1329
Plaintiff:
Peter Allan, Sr., Russell Hatton, Michael D. Benson and others
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Jodi Harpstead, in her official capacity as Commissioner of Department of Human Services, Marshall Smith, in his official capacity as Chief Executive Director of Direct Care and Treatment for the Minnesota Sex Offender Program and others
Wilson v. Simpson et al
as 5:2023cv06114
Plaintiff:
Daniel L Wilson
Defendant:
Shona Simpson and Mark Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Masson
as 5:2022cv06073
Plaintiff:
Daniel L Wilson
Defendant:
Johnathon Masson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Crews, et al
as 5:2022cv06030
Plaintiff:
Daniel L Wilson
Defendant:
Campbell, Michael Parsons, Ryan Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamar Wilson v. Dexter Payne
as 22-1338
Appellant:
Lamar Daniel Ron Wilson
Respondent / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections
Allan et al v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2020cv01980
Plaintiff:
Steven Hawkins, Patrick Otten, Maikijah Hakeem and others
Defendant:
Nancy Johnston, Jodi Harpstead, Marshall Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Wilson v. State of Arkansas
as 6:2019cv06073
Petitioner:
Lamar Daniel Ron Wilson
Respondent:
Wendy Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson v. Minnesota Sex Offender Program et al
as 0:2018cv03352
Defendant:
Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Katie McDowell, Joseph Mullen and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Aaron Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blodgett v. Jarvey et al
as 1:2017cv00055
Plaintiff:
Ricky Joe Blodgett
Defendant:
John A Jarvey, Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, Myron Gookin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
