Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Hendershot et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2024cv00958
Plaintiff:
Albert E Hendershot, Gerald Alameda, Lindell Algiere and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Hendershot et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Albert E Hendershot, Gerald Alameda, Lindell Algiere and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
STONE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01173
Plaintiff:
DANIEL A STONE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Riley v. United States Bankruptcy Court et al
as 3:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
Charles Riley
Defendant:
United States Bankruptcy Court, Hon. David R. Duncan, Bruce M. Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. Daniel Stone
as 21-7738
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL AARON STONE
US v. Daniel Stone
as 20-6729
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL AARON STONE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Daniel Stone v. United States
as 20-1711
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Petitioner / Appellant:
Daniel Lee Stone
Stone et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01566
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Libby Stone and Daniel R. Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STONE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv33821
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JAMES STONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stone v. United States of America
as 4:2020cv00009
Petitioner:
Daniel Lee Stone
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
