Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01887
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01448
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Richardson v. Frazier
as 3:2022cv01447
Petitioner:
Kevin Richardson and Daniel Beard
Respondent:
Frazier and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RICHARDSON v. USA
as 1:2022cv00329
Plaintiff:
KEVIN RICHARDSON and DANIEL BEARD
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
BEARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv29077
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BEARD
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BEARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv01063
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BEARD
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00530
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
BEARD v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv02289
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA LP and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
Plaintiff:
BYRON DANIEL BEARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arnett et al v. Denton
as 1:2012cv00913
Plaintiff:
Teresa M. Arnett, Daniel Beard, Sharleen Pelzl and others
Defendant:
Frank Denton and State of Texas
Interested Party:
Texas Humane Legislation Network and The Humane Society of the United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beard et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2011cv01635
Plaintiff:
Daniel Beard , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
