Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Warren v. Starke County Sheriffs Department et al
as 3:2023cv00828
Plaintiff:
David Warren and David H Warren
Defendant:
Starke County Sheriffs Department, Jon Lendermon, Daniel Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCGRAW et al v. ALTUGLAS LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01824
Plaintiff:
Timothy McGraw, Emily Cohen and Danielle Byrd
Defendant:
altuglas llc, Trinseo LLC and TRINSEO PLC
Bailey, III v. Jezierski et al
as 3:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Howard A Bailey, III
Defendant:
Eric Jezierski, Daniel Byrd, Gayle Lois Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Byrd v. BP Expl & Prod
as 22-30661
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jennifer Danielle Byrd
Defendant / Appellee:
BP Exploration & Production, Incorporated, BP America Production Company, BP, P.L.C. and others
BYRD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv44641
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BYRD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00520
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BYRD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv56119
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BYRD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Byrd v. Key Real Estate Associates, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00976
Defendant:
Board of Managers of Cathedral Condominiums and Key Real Estate Associates, LLC
Plaintiff:
Daniel Byrd
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
US v. Lewis Byrd
as 17-6711
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LEWIS DANIEL BYRD
Byrd v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03642
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Danielle Byrd
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, BP PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
