Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Palmer v. Garcia et al
as 2:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
John J. Palmer
Defendant:
Abel Garcia, Jr., John Doe, Bane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Esquivel-Garcia v. Garland
as 21-6256
Petitioner:
DANIEL ESQUIVEL-GARCIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jamal Hendrix v. M. Sharp, et al
as 21-15358
Defendant / Appellee:
ELLIOT BURLEIGH, H. CHUNG, C. DAVIS, Sgt. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAL DAMON HENDRIX, AKA Jamar Hendrix
Daniel Esquivel et al v. Manuel Morales et al
as 2:2019cv08870
Defendant:
Manuel Morales, Pedro Marques Jr., Pedro Marques and others
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Esquivel, Los Rieleros del Norte, LLC, Eugenio Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Hendrix v. Battierra et al
as 3:2019cv00574
Defendant:
Alfredo Montes, Gomez, Homan and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hendrix v. Ray et al
as 3:2018cv00244
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, S Boyer, Ronald Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix v. Sharp et al
as 3:2018cv00084
Defendant:
c/o Arias, C. Ashdown, R Boone-Sharp and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ESQUIVEL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv10505
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ESQUIVEL
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hendrix v. Ray et al
as 2:2017cv01719
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, S Boyer, Ronald Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valle et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv00798
Plaintiff:
Deanna Valle , Roberta Adams , April Avent and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
