Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Lance et al v. 3M Company f/k/a Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. et al
as 2:2025cv11868
Plaintiff:
David Preston Lance, Jeffrey Adams, John Edward Aiple and others
Defendant:
3M Company f/k/a Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemical Americas, Inc., Allstar Fire Eqiupment and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Nolze et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02836
Defendant:
Du Pont De Nemours Inc, 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Amercas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
William Nolze, Stephen Walter Miller, Randy Paul Miltier and others
Petitioner:
Arthur Thomas Noonan, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Nolze et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00664
Plaintiff:
William Nolze, Stephen Walter Miller, Randy Paul Miltier and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Amercas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Petitioner:
Arthur Thomas Noonan, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Feliciano et al v. MAPFRE et al
as 3:2018cv01537
Defendant:
General Services Administration, Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, Luis Bonilla-Gonzaga and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Negron-Feliciano, Kenneth Negron-Feliciano, Roberto Negron-Vargas and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
USA v. Daniel Negron
as 11-20701
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL PEREZ NEGRON, also known as Daniel Perez, also known as Daniel Negron Perez, also known as Daniel Perez-Negron, also known as Raul Gonzales
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
