Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Sanchez v. MacDonald, et al.
as 26-4480
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SANCHEZ
Defendant:
KENNETH MACDONALD, TOWN OF ATHERTON, CITY OF SAN MATEO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03569
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Sanchez v. Synchony Bank N.A.
as 3:2026cv03167
Plaintiff:
Marcos Daniel Sanchez
Defendant:
Synchony Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1441 FHLB: Financial Inst Reform Receiving Enforcement Act 1989
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01609
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01298
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sanchez v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv02087
Plaintiff:
Danielle Sanchez
Defendant:
Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. and Reddy Ice LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sanchez v. Capital One Bank, N.A.
as 3:2026cv02964
Plaintiff:
Marcos Daniel Sanchez
Defendant:
Capital One Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1666 Fair Credit Billing Act Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01926
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sanchez v. Werner Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv03045
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sanchez
Defendant:
Werner Enterprises, Inc. and Jeffalon Renae Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
DeYapp et al v. United States of America
as 1:2026cv00914
Plaintiff:
Lena DeYapp, Jeffrey McGinnis, Jonathan Lambert and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
