Cases 1 - 10 of 11
John Miller v. Thomas Nelling, et al
as 23-2788
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN RYAN MILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS NELLING, THOMAS GOGGIN, JOHN O'DONNELL and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH ELIAS, TRACEY LAWS, MITCHELL ROCK and others
MILLER v. GOGGIN et al
as 2:2022cv03329
Plaintiff:
JOHN RYAN MILLER
Defendant:
THOMAS NELLING, JOSEPH ELIAS, TRACEY LAWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hails v. Dennis et al
as 1:2017cv00259
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wade Hails
Defendant:
Timothy Trent Dennis, Kimberly D. Wasdin, Michael Shawn Gaull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fredrick Norwood, et al v. City of Mendenhall, MS, et al
as 15-60229
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDRICK NORWOOD, VIRGINIA MCLAUREN and DANIELLE WADE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MENDENHALL, MISSISSIPPI, DONALD BRUCE BARLOW and CLAY HOLLOWELL
Norwood et al v. City of Mendenhall, Mississippi et al
as 3:2013cv00580
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Norwood , Virginia McLauren and Danielle Wade
Defendant:
City of Mendenhall, Mississippi, Donald Bruce Barlow, Clay Hollowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coots v. City of Kemah, Texas et al
as 4:2010cv05157
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wade Coots
Defendant:
City of Kemah, Texas , T. Wayne Lockett and Richard Burgess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Coots v. City of Kemah et al
as 3:2011cv00003
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wade Coots
Defendant:
City of Kemah , T. Wayne Lockett and Richard Burgess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HAWKINS et al v. LLOYD et al
as 2:2010cv04284
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. HAWKINS, ASHLYN V. SAUNDERS, III and DANIELLE WADE
Defendant:
ROXANNE LLOYD and BRIAN LLOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Wade v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2008cv03063
Plaintiff:
Danielle Wade
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Mahmoud Shamah, Richard Doroniuk and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
