Cases 41 - 50 of 144
CORNA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv10880
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL PATRICK CORNA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mahoney v. McDaniels et al
as 1:2020cv04076
Plaintiff:
Daniel P. Mahoney and Daniel Patrick Mahoney
Defendant:
Hope Hatchell, Eric McDaniels and Lynett Patton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BULLEMER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv06303
Plaintiff:
DANIEL PATRICK BULLEMER
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphy v. Kenton Ohio Police Dept. et al
as 3:2020cv02342
Defendant:
Kenton Ohio Police Dept. and Ryan Atchley
Plaintiff:
Daniel Patrick Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv02813
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mankaruse v. Intel Corporation
as 20-2297
Defendant / Appellee:
INTEL CORPORATION, DOES 1-10, INCLUSIVE, MATTHEW ROBERT HULSE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAGUI MANKARUSE
Murphy v. Correction Center of Northwest Ohio
as 3:2020cv02103
Defendant:
Correction Center of Northwest Ohio
Plaintiff:
Daniel Patrick Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUSSEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv40940
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL PATRICK HUSSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nagui Mankaruse v. Intel Corporation, et al
as 20-55632
Defendant / Appellee:
DOES, 1 through 10, inclusive, MATTHEW ROBERT HULSE, an individual, ANDY D. BRYANT, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAGUI MANKARUSE
CAVEGN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv30370
Plaintiff:
DANIEL PATRICK CAVEGN
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
