Cases 1 - 10 of 10
SPARKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv52345
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SPARKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SPARKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv79203
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SPARKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bailey v. Ford Motor Company (TV1)
as 3:2020cv00091
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
James Bailey, Mary Mcknatt, Lana Rymer and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
LANE et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03273
Plaintiff:
ROBERT THOMPSON, LUCIUS SYKES, DEREK BRADHAM and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lane et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02235
Plaintiff:
Robert Thompson, Lucius Sykes, Derek Bradham and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Martha Harris v. Hardeman County, Tennessee, et al
as 15-5767
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTHA J. VALENTINE HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
HARDEMAN COUNTY, TENNESSEE, JOHN DOOLEN, Sheriff, DANIEL SPARKS, Deputy and others
Harris v. Hardeman County Sheriff Dept et al
as 1:2013cv01100
Plaintiff:
Martha J Harris
Defendant:
Hardeman County Sheriff Dept, County Jail and Deputies, Doolen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garza v. Turley, et al
as 11-4115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERARDO THOMAS GARZA
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN TURLEY, BILLIE CASPER, BRYANT HERMAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padilla vs. Ulibarri, et al
as 1:2008cv00668
Plaintiff:
Michael Ralph Padilla
Defendant:
Thomas Ulibarri, Daniel Sparks, Marcos Vasquez and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
