Cases 1 - 10 of 10
WILLIAMS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00863
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DANIEL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv03233
Plaintiff:
Daniel Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Moran v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 0:2019cv02632
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Daniel William Moran
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Karen Scott v. Andrew Saul
as 2:2019cv08016
Plaintiff:
KAREN SCOTT for DANIEL WILLIAM BRYANT and Karen Scott
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hahn Jr v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2018cv00091
Plaintiff:
Daniel William Hahn, Jr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Erickson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2018cv00169
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Daniel William Erickson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
CRAVEY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 5:2017cv00508
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WILLIAM CRAVEY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINSTRATION
Undetermined:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gast v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv00121
Plaintiff:
Daniel William Gast
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Daniel William Shepardson v. Carolyn W Colvin
as 5:2013cv01895
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Daniel William Shepardson
Duran v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv01250
Plaintiff:
Daniel William Duran
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
