Cases 1 - 8 of 8
D.A. Realestate Investment, LLC v. City of Norfolk
as 23-1863
Plaintiff / Appellant:
D.A. REALESTATE INVESTMENT, LLC, an inactive Virginia limited liability company, REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS TAX PARCEL NO. 49314300 and DANNY FOX, an individual and active-duty servicemember and owner of D.A. Realestate Investment, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF NORFOLK, a municipal corporation
D.A. Realestate Investment, LLC et al v. City of Norfolk
as 2:2021cv00653
Plaintiff:
D.A. Realestate Investment, LLC, Tax Parcel No.: 49314300, Real property known as Tax Parcel No.: 49314300 and others
Defendant:
City of Norfolk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOX et al. v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv02267
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
DANNY FOX, DANNY RAY FOX and SANDRA FOX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Luck v. Fox et al
as 1:2009cv01325
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Luck
Defendant:
Danny Fox and Roosevelt Terry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randy Luck v. Danny Fox
as 09-6995
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY LEE LUCK
Defendant - Appellee:
DANNY FOX, Sheriff of Boydton, ROOSEVELT TERRY, Chief of Boydton Jail and UNKNOWN, Dr.; Boydton Jail Contracted M.D.
Luck v. Fox et al
as 1:2009cv00335
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Luck
Defendant:
Danny Fox, Roosevelt Terry and Unknown
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dextram Harris v. Tim Salley
as 09-6345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEXTRAM LOUIS HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
TIM SALLEY, Sergeant, Deputy Sheriff, Personal and Official Capacity
Defendant - None:
MECKLENBURG COUNTY JAIL, JOHN DOE, Magistrate, Personal and Official Capacity, E. E. COLEMAN, JR., Clerk of Court, Personal and Official Capacity and others
Harris v. Salley
as 3:2006cv00837
Plaintiff:
Dextram Louis Harris
Defendant:
Tim Salley, Mecklenburg County Jail, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
