Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Fredrickson v. Marshall et al
as 3:2026cv03210
Plaintiff:
Timothy Fredrickson
Defendant:
William K. Marshall, III, Bryan Weaver, Gregory Schanfish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
LUNDAHL v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2026cv00291
Defendant:
CENTURYLINK, DONALD J. TRUMP, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
HOLLI LUNDAHL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Easton v. Hall et al
as 4:2025cv06338
Plaintiff:
Chanell Renee Easton
Defendant:
Tanisha Hall, Danon Colbert and William K Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hanson v. Quick, et al
as 25-7044
Petitioner:
JOHN FITZGERALD HANSON
Respondent:
CHRISTE QUICK, Warden, STEVEN HARPE, Director of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections, DANON COLBERT, Acting Regional Director, U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Hanson v. Quick et al
as 6:2025cv00081
Petitioner:
John Fitzgerald Hanson
Respondent:
Christe Quick, Steven Harpe, Danon Colbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hanson v. Drummond et al
as 1:2025cv00102
Plaintiff:
John Fitzgerald Hanson and George John Hanson
Defendant:
Gentner Drummond, Danon Colbert, William W Lothrop and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Al-Amin v. Colbert
as 4:2024cv00614
Plaintiff:
Jamil Al-Amin
Defendant:
Danon Colbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fly, et al. v. Diaz, et al.
as 24-5509
Defendant:
Dr. JILL ROTH, IAN CONNERS, National Inmate Appeals Administrator, K. FLEMMING, Psychologist at United States Penitentiary and others
Plaintiff:
BRYSON KNOBELOCH, WILLIAM ANTHONY FLY, Nevaeh Olivia Knobeloch and others
Bell v. Newland et al
as 4:2022cv00559
Plaintiff:
Paul Edward Bell
Defendant:
C Newland, M Gutierrez, Danon Colbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
