Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 269
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr. v. K. Richardson
as 24-6397
Plaintiff: KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR.
Defendant: K. RICHARDSON, (Lieutenant) at Sussex Complex, J. M. BRANCH, (Unit Manager/Chief of Housing and Programming) at Sussex Complex, BETH CABELL, (Head Warden) at Sussex Complex and others
Darden v. Huhn
as 4:2024cv00551
Petitioner: Dominique Deangelo Darden
Respondent: Valerie Huhn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Darden v. Luechtefeld et al
as 4:2024cv00553
Plaintiff: Dominique Deangelo Darden
Defendant: Debra Luechtefeld, Kyle Clinkingbeard, Valerie Huhn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Simpson v. Glenn Youngkin
as 24-6338
Plaintiff: THOMAS BARTHOLOMEW SIMPSON
Defendant: GLENN YOUNGKIN, ROBERT MOSIER, JASON S. MIYARES and others
Tucker v. VADOC et al
as 1:2024cv00601
Plaintiff: Taiveon Tucker
Defendant: VADOC, Dunlevy, Whitehurst and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Rose v. Darden et al
as 2:2024cv00201
Plaintiff: Derek Kent Rose
Defendant: Tony Darden, Cris Desmond, Angela Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sorrick v. West et al
as 1:2024cv00744
Plaintiff: Kevin Sorrick
Defendant: Warden, Warden Walter West, Warden Deborah Darden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. Darden
as 1:2024cv00274
Plaintiff: Dewayne Reid
Defendant: Tony Darden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lujano v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv00865
Plaintiff: Adam Anthony Lujano
Defendant: City of Chicago, Edward Villazobos, Dominique Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darden v. Santoro
as 3:2024cv00073
Plaintiff: James Leon Darden, Jr
Defendant: Santoro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?