Cases 11 - 20 of 175
BRIDGES v. ADMINISTRATOR, N.J. STATE PRISON et al
as 1:2023cv01594
Petitioner:
DARIUS BRIDGES
Respondent:
ADMINISTRATOR, N.J. STATE PRISON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Orange)
as 6:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Darius Deshon Wright
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MIDDLETON v. MOODY
as 4:2023cv00070
Petitioner:
DARIUS T MIDDLETON
Respondent:
ASHLEY MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maslow v. Warden et al
as 4:2022cv00242
Petitioner:
Thomas Maslow
Respondent:
Warden, Honorable Mrs. Suzanne Smith, Mrs. Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Cool
as 3:2022cv01634
Petitioner:
Darius Washington
Respondent:
Warden Willaim Cool
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARSHALL v. PRETORIUS
as 1:2022cv01625
Petitioner:
DARIUS MARSHALL
Respondent:
T. PRETORIUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vitkus v. Blinken et al
as 1:2022cv00845
Plaintiff:
Darius Vitkus
Defendant:
Antony Blinken, Attorney General Merrick Garland, Nick Proffitt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Clark v. McConahay
as 1:2022cv01166
Petitioner:
Darius Clark
Respondent:
Warden Tim McConahay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DUNN v. TOBY
as 1:2022cv01063
Petitioner:
DARIUS JARRELL DUNN
Respondent:
Annette Toby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DUNN v. TOBY
as 5:2022cv00108
Petitioner:
DARIUS JARRELL DUNN
Respondent:
ANNETTE TOBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
